Wednesday, September 16, 2015
Bishop Slupski; an unfortunate situation.
Fr. Francis Slupski was ordained in Poland under difficult circumstances. His education was poor, and was given permission to be ordained under special circumstances, especially due to his personal familial situation, need for financial support, and situations regarding the war at that time in Poland. The Ordinations and Consecrations of Bishop Slupski must all be called into question. In the Sacristy, in the Chapel of the Bishop, in 2012, were found Holy Oils from the 1970's and 1980's. When informed of the issue of validity regarding the use of such rancid oil, ignorance was pleaded, and charge of the destruction of the oils was given to the delegate. After the so called "Consecration" of "Bishop" Neal Webster, Neal Webster then provided Bishop Slupski all of his Holy Oils. This is a problem due to the following reasons.
Neal Webster was not conditionally ordained by Bishop Slupski in any manner, and this is a fact. Neal Webster was ordained in the lineage of the group from Palmar de Troya Spain. This group claimed to be appointed Pope by the Blessed Virgin herself, led by an infirm blind man, and who have been the cause of the scandal of many, many people. Neal Webster, if not properly ordained, is not capapable of providing valid Holy Oils to Bishop Slupski. All of Bishop Slupski's Holy Oils, used after the consecration of Neal Webster, were given to Bishop Slupski by "Bishop" Neal Webster, and kept in the Ambry, at Bishop Slupski's Cathedra, in Rock Falls, Illinois.
Due to these unfortunate circumstances, none of Bishop Slupski's ordainds, and Episcopi, may be considered valid in the eyes of the Faithful. No Faithful may recieve the Sacraments from any of his Priests, or Bishops, or the progeny thereof. Bishop Slupski's confection of the Most Holy Eucharist, and his Deliverance of the Sacrament of Penance may be still considered valid. None of the Faithful in reception of the Sacraments from the Priests and Bishops descending from Slupski's lienage are held in any guilt or any sin whatsoever, regarding their reception of the Sacraments from these progency Priets and Bishops, and these laity may continue to seek other validly ordained Priests, and validly Consecrated Bishops in good conscience, perhaps from the Society of St. Pius X.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Your abysmal display of ignorance is embarrassing! The Holy Oils are not essential to either the ordination of priests or the consecration of bishops. Even if rancid oils had been used in any of Bishop Slupski’s ordinations or consecrations, this would have absolutely no impact on the validity of the ordinations and consecrations.
ReplyDeleteRefer to Pope Pius XII’s "Sacramentum Ordinis" where he clearly defines the MATTER of ordination of priests and consecration of bishops being the IMPOSITION OF HANDS, while the forms are the prescribed words.
Your lack of knowledge concerning sacramental theology is embarrasing!
ReplyDeleteVery sad that "Timothy" apparently has never met Bishop Slupski and has no problem slandering the good name of the bishop. He also has no qualms in playing fast and easy, as well as the foolish amateur, with matters that pertain to Theology and Liturgy. His gross ignorance is obvious. He takes liberty with theology or in fact, hasn't even bothered to study the basics of Sacramental theology. Holy Oils have absolutely nothing to do with validity and it is the laying on of hands and the words of the Preface (in fact, 16 of them) which are required for validity in Episcopal Consecration in the Roman Catholic Church. What a grave sin "Timothy" is guilty of in publishing these words, besides his obviously never visiting the Sacristy above mentioned. Obviously he is a Novus Ordo dupe or simply stupid, or perhaps both. At any rate the good faithful can be certain that the venerable Order of the Redemptorist Fathers did not ordain on the quick anyone, especially pre-Vatican II. Timothy might find comfort in sticking with the SSPX who takes in doubtful Novus Ordo presbyters (which Bishop Slupski would never permit) and take their chances that way with validity. It should be well worth mentioning that the late Fr. James Wathen, author of the "Great Sacrilege" had Bishop Slupski offer his Requiem Mass. Me thinks Fr. Wathen was a bit more astute about the bishop than the author of this blog.
ReplyDeletePray for the Repose of the Soul of Bishop Francis Slupski.
ReplyDeleteFr. Angel
Pray for the Repose of the Soul of Most Rev Paul Petko who was Consecrated by Bishop Slupski.
ReplyDeleteFr. Angel
R+I+P for both of Them.
ReplyDelete